To memory, I can only think of one program that lets you create Windows live disks and it wasn’t nearly as light or as quick to install. The installation is quick and its light on resources. Hackers can easily create customized live boot disks and drives from any Linux distribution that they want. This is arguably the best reason for choosing Linux over Mac and Windows. Reason #2: Linux is lighter and more portable In addition, Linux makes scripting in any of the scripting languages simple and effective. In Linux, everything can be controlled by the terminal in the most miniscule to the most macro level. In Windows, you only can control what Microsoft allows you to control. That means Linux gives users infinite amount of control over the system. This is the reason that though hacking tools like Metasploit or nmap are ported for Windows, they don’t have capabilities like Linux.Ĭompared to Windows, Linux is more granular. This hampers their work as hacking is usually going beyond the well-defined command lines. Windows has a command line structure, such as command prompt and Power Shell, however, these don’t give hackers/developers the complete functionality and integration compared with Linux. This restrict user interaction to point-and-click navigation (slower) and application/system menu options for configuration. In contrast, Windows was built around the graphic user interface (GUI). This is the reason that most hacking and pentesting tools are built into Linux have greater functionality above and beyond their windows counterparts. This grants hackers and Linux far greater access and control over their system and awesome customization. Linux was designed around a strong and highly integrated command line interface.
0 kommentar(er)
